PEMBELAJARAN THINK-TALK-WRITE DALAM MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN SOAL GEOMETRI

Anton Prayitno

Abstract


Students’ poor ability in completing geometry questions is one of the crucial problems in mathematics education. In this mixed method research, Think-Talk-Write cooperative learning was used to enhance seventh-grade students’ ability in completing geometry questions. Samples were 35 seventh grade students in one of junior high school in East Java. Instruments were students’ worksheets (LKS), written test, as well as observation sheets. Think-Talk-Write learning was conducted in two learning sessions. Results showed that Think-Talk-Write learning increased students’ ability in completing geometry questions, both in completing questions in the LKS and in the written test. Steps in Think-Talk-Write learning help the students to reflect, organize, and improve their understanding so that they are able to answer the given geometry questions better. In addition to the contribution of each step in Think-Talk-Write learning itself, teacher also contributed to students’ improved ability in completing geometry questions, especially in terms of detecting and guiding the students’ to overcome difficulties in completing geometry questions.

Keywords


cooperative learning; think talk write strategy; geometry; teacher’s role in learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chapin, S.H., O’Connor, C., & Anderson, N.C. (2009). Classroom Discussions: Using Math Talk to Help Students Learn, Grades K-6, 2nd Ed. Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions

Chianson, M.M., Kurumeh, M.S., & Obida, J.A. (2010). Effect of cooperative learning strategy on students’ retention in circle geometry in secondary schools in Benue State, Nigeria, American Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 2(1), 33-36.

Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K.A., Marsh, E.J., Nathan, M.J., & Willingham, D.T. (2013). Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4-58.

Gal, H., & Linchevski, L. (2010). To See or Not to See: Analyzing Difficulties in Geometry from the Perspective of Visual Perception, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(2), 163-183.

Huinker, D. & Laughlin, C. 1996. ”Talk Your Way into Writing”. Dalam Communication in Mathematics K-12 and Beyond, 1996 year book. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.

Imswatama, A., & Muhassanah, N. (2016). Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Geometri Analitik Bidang Materi Garis dan Lingkaran, Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(1), 1-12.

Junaedi, I. (2012). Tipe Kesalahan Mahasiswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal-Soal Geometri Analitik Berdasar Newman’s Error Analysis (NEA), Jurnal Kreano, 3(2), 125-133.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2013). Kompetensi Dasar: Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP)/ Madrasah Tsanawiyah (MTs). Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Kirschner, P.A. , Sweller, J. & Clark, R.E. (2006) Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching, Educational Psychologist, 41 (2), 75-86.

Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 International Results in Mathematics. Chessnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center Lynch School of Education, Boston College.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and Standars for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.

Pugalee, D.K. (2004). A Comparison of Verbal and Written Descriptions of Students' Problem Solving, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55(1), 27-47.

Safrina, K., Ikhsan, M., & Ahmad, A. (2014). Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Geometri melalui Pembelajaran Kooperatif Berbasis Teori Van Hiele, Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 1(1), 9-20.

Stein, M.K., Engle, R.A , Smith, M.S. & Hughes, E.K. (2008) Orchestrating Productive Mathematical Discussions: Five Practices for Helping Teachers Move Beyond Show and Tell, Mathematical Thinking and Learning,10(4), 313-340.

Sumadiasa, I.G. (2014). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 5 Dolo Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Luas Permukaan Dan Volume Limas, Jurnal Elektronik Pendidikan Matematika Tadulako, 1(2), 197-208.

Sumarmo, U., Hidayat, W., Zukarnaen, R., Hamidah, Ratna, S. (2012). Kemampuan Dan Disposisi Berpikir Logis, Kritis, Dan Kreatif Matematik : Eksperimen terhadap Siswa SMA Menggunakan Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah dan Strategi Think-Talk-Write, Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 17(1), 17-33.

Tarim, K., & Capar, G. (2015). Efficacy of the Cooperative Learning Method on Mathematics Achievement and Attitude: A Meta-Analysis Research, Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(2), 553-559.

Utami, A.D. (2016). Tipe Kesalahan Mahasiswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal-Soal Geometri Berdasar Newman’s Error Analysis (NEA), Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 85-92.

Walmsley, A.L.E., & Muniz, J. (2003). Cooperative Learning and Its Effects in a High School Geometry Classroom, Mathematics Teacher, 96(2), 112-116.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v21i2.821

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JPMIPA http://journal.fpmipa.upi.edu/index.php/jpmipa/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JPMIPA) or Journal of Mathematics and Science Teaching 

All rights reserverd. pISSN 1412-0917 eISSN 2443-3616

Copyright © Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education (FPMIPA) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)

 

View My Stats